Why Is Malaysia Shaped Like This? A Lesson in Colonial Cartography (and Chaos)
From Singapore to Sabah, Malaysia’s map is a messy tale of autonomy, federation, and the politics of unity.
Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter, or Telegram and WhatsApp channels for the latest stories and updates.
Malaysia’s borders are a chaotic legacy of British colonial tinkering, strategic geopolitics, and a federation cobbled together with compromises. When the British drew their plans for Malaysia, it wasn’t with unity in mind but convenience—and maybe a touch of ‘divide and rule’ genius.
The Federation of Malaysia, formed in 1963, united Peninsular Malaysia with Singapore, Sabah, and Sarawak. At first glance, it seemed like a bold move to stabilise the region. But look closer, and you’ll find a patchwork of political autonomy, cultural divides, and a sprinkling of “oops moments.”
Sabah and Sarawak got significant autonomy—think immigration control and land rights—while Peninsular Malaysia remained the political and economic centre.
Singapore, however, wasn’t sticking around long enough to enjoy the chaos; it was politely shown the door in 1965 due to political and ethnic tensions.
One Peninsula, Two Stories
Even within the peninsula, the story of uneven development is as fascinating as it is frustrating. The British favoured the Indian Ocean side, where major ports and trade hubs like Penang and Malacca thrived.
The South China Sea coast was largely ignored, separated by rugged mountain ranges, making it feel like a different world altogether. This neglect left places like Kelantan charmingly laid-back but historically underdeveloped.
Sabah and Sarawak: More Autonomy, Less Equality
The autonomy granted to Sabah and Sarawak was meant to sweeten the deal for joining Malaysia, allowing them to preserve their unique identities. But decades later, the imbalance between East and West Malaysia is stark. Sabah and Sarawak often feel like distant relatives who aren’t invited to the big family decisions.
It’s a case of one-sided autonomy—a bittersweet setup where they can manage local matters but remain politically marginalised. The absentee landlord problem? Alive and well, with power concentrated firmly in the peninsula.
KL, Georgetown, and Malacca: A Tale of Three Cities
If Malaysia’s cities were siblings, Kuala Lumpur would be the ambitious middle child—less uptight than Singapore but just as determined. Georgetown feels like a nostalgic uncle, steeped in colonial charm and old-world character. Malacca? A quirky cousin with European vibes. Together, they tell a story of Malaysia’s colonial past, with each city bearing the hallmarks of its unique historical influences.
Historical Hiccups and Humour
And then there are the oddities, like the Japanese invasion of Kelantan in 1941—a full two hours before Pearl Harbour. No one in the United States knew about it because communications were so bad in the remote, jungle-covered region. It’s just another example of how Malaysia’s geography has influenced its history in unexpected ways.
The Lasting Legacy
Today, Malaysia’s map is a visual reminder of colonial ambition and cultural diversity. It’s a nation shaped by compromises, where autonomy and inequality coexist. The borders may not be perfect, but they tell a story that’s uniquely Malaysian—messy, diverse, and endlessly fascinating.
Share your thoughts with us via TRP’s Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or Threads.
