Now Reading
Najib’s Road To Freedom: Court Dismisses Dispute By His Lawyer On Panel Of Judges

Najib’s Road To Freedom: Court Dismisses Dispute By His Lawyer On Panel Of Judges

Najib is appealing against his 12-year prison sentence and fine for embezzling RM42 million in SRC funds.

Subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest stories and updates.

Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s application to review the conviction and sentence in hiSRC International Sdn Bhd trial began with a dispute on the list of judges.

Before the proceedings could begin, lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah stood up.

He objected to the list of Federal Court Judges presiding over the judicial review.

The judges who heard the proceedings were the Chief Justice of Sabah and Sarawak, Datuk Abdul Rahman Sebli; three Federal Court Judges, Datuk Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Datuk Rhodzariah Bujang and Datuk Nordin Hassan and Court of Appeal Judge, Datuk Abu Bakar Jais.

Muhammad Shafee objected to the composition of the panel of judges who also listed Abu Bakar’s name.

Berita Harian quoted him as saying that according to Section 74 of the Court of Justice Act (CJA) 1974, the composition of Federal Court judges must consist of Federal Court judges only.

What is the importance in terms of justice, putting Abu Bakar in the panel list where the Chief Justice did not state the reason for the listing.

Lawyer Muhammad Shafee on why he objected to the list of Federal Court Judges.

According to Article 122(2) of the Federal Constitution, a judge of the Court of Appeal other than the President of the Court of Appeal may sit as a judge of the Federal Court if the Chief Justice thinks that the interests of justice so require.

However, Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Datuk V Sithambaram said Najib as the applicant, must show that there is danger or bias when Abu Bakar is included in the panel’s list.

There is no question in the listing of this judge in the composition of the panel because it is made in line with the provision in the constitution.

DPP Datuk V Sithambaram on why there is nothing wrong with the list of Federal Court Judges.

Sithambaram added that Abu Bakar is a competent and authoritative judge because the chief judge named the latter.

Court Holds Sway

Later in the afternoon, Najib’s objection to the panel composition was thrown out, and Abu Bakar remained on the five-man panel.

Justice Abdul Rahman Sebli said the law is clear that the Chief Justice can appoint a Court of Appeal judge for a Federal Court review.

Meanwhile, Najib’s supporters gathered at the grounds of the Palace of Justice to show their support. 

They distributed flyers explaining why Najib was innocent.

READ MORE: [Watch] Bossku Supporters Cry, Pray And Chant ‘Hidup Najib’ Outside The Federal Court

Share your thoughts with us via TRP’s FacebookTwitter, and Instagram.

Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.

© 2024 The Rakyat Post. All Rights Reserved. Owned by 3rd Wave Media Sdn Bhd