fbpx

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 5, 2015:

The following is a media statement by 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) president Arul Kanda Kandasamy in view of the proposed debate:

I refer to the recent ruling by Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia on Tony Pua’s challenge to debate me on “live” television. I have the utmost respect for the Speaker and his wisdom to safeguard the integrity of the august House and proceedings of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC).

Pua challenged me to a “live” televised debate on Oct 29. On the same day, I accepted Pua’s challenge with one condition — “In order to maintain the integrity of the PAC’s investigation, and to avoid any conflict of interest, Pua must first resign from the PAC”. When Pua lacked the courage to do the right thing and resign from the PAC, on Oct 31, I withdrew the condition.

I accepted his challenge with zero conditions as Pua has made so many wrong allegations about 1MDB and me personally, that I wanted to publicly debate with and correct him.

Pua has now confirmed he will not resign from the PAC and that he will no longer debate me. He has chosen to hide behind his PAC membership, to run away from a showdown he aggressively harassed me to accept, which I agreed to with zero conditions.

In hindsight, I suspect Pua’s challenge was more politically motivated than a desire for the truth to prevail. As a two-term MP, surely he is well versed in parliamentary procedures and knew all along, that the debate could not take place.

I note that Pua’s coalition has now offered Rafizi Ramli as replacement debater. The obvious question is why doesn’t Rafizi replace Pua in the PAC, so that Pua can debate me? It was specifically Pua who challenged me. He made it personal, and used mocking words like “I will not punch him”, “my allegations”, “embarrassing me” etc.

Pua issued the debate challenge and I accepted, with no conditions. There was never any question of debate with Pakatan Harapan, which has now appeared out of nowhere, in a desperate and last-minute attempt, to save Pua from embarrassment. These are clearly political games which I, as a professional, will not be drawn into.

I respect Rafizi as a worthy opponent. He is a good debater, orator and gentleman. I enjoyed sparring with him in our younger days. However, the Speaker is the ultimate authority on all matters relating to Parliament. He has made his ruling on my responsibility as a PAC witness and that any debate should only take place after the PAC hearings.

As for the 10 questions that Pua allegedly wanted to raise in the debate, I hereby confirm that 1MDB will respond to these questions, at the appropriate time and in the appropriate forum, including a lawful authority such as the PAC.

1MDB reiterates our readiness to appear in front of the PAC. In the meantime, my team and I remain focused and committed to implementing the 1MDB rationalisation plan.

Related Posts

Related Posts

Related Posts

Next Post